Skip to main content

Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » M/s RAJESH METALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH KAKAR v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

M/s RAJESH METALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH KAKAR v. OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

High Court, Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh, Justice & Shail Jain, Justice

M/s RAJESH METALS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH KAKAR
v.
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

W.P.(C) 15612/2025, CM APPL. 63899/2025 & CM APPL. 63900/2025 dated 10.10.2025

Law : GST
Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017
Relevant Section : Section 107
Decision : In favour of assessee

Demand – Fraudulent availment of ITC – Goods-less invoices – Department contended supplier firms fake and all invoices bogus – Petitioner asserted goods received with proper invoices and e-way bills – Non-attendance in personal hearing – Reply to SCN not duly considered – Writ jurisdiction ordinarily not exercised in cases of alleged fraudulent ITC where statutory remedy of appeal exists under Section 107 of CGST Act – Court noted possible violation of principles of natural justice due to incomplete consideration of reply – Held: Writ petition disposed – Petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit and cost of Rs. 10,000 by 30.11.2025 not be dismissed on ground of limitation.

Represented By:

Counsel for the Petitioner: Aman Sinha, Anant Vijay, Nirmal Dixit, Yash Raj & Himani Kaushik, Advs.

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member