M/s PINKY MARBLES v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE & ORS – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

📅 June 5, 2026 👤 Team Batuk Consultancy 📂 GST, GST Case Laws

High Court, Rajasthan

Pankaj Bhandari, Justice & Shubha Mehta, Justice

M/s PINKY MARBLES

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE & ORS

D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITON No. 4297/2024 dated 10.05.2024

Law : GST

Act Name : Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017

Relevant Section : Section 75

Decision : In favour of assessee

Opportunity of being heard not provided – Violation of natural justice – Writ Petition filed to challenge impugned order arguing that they were not provided an opportunity for a hearing as required under Section 75(5) of the CGST Act – Despite the request for adjournment of hearing by the petitioner, impugned order was passed without providing the additional adjournment – The respondent contended that the petitioner was given three opportunities to appear – The petitioner failure to appear, leads to impugned order – Also, contended that It is not mandatory to grant three adjournments in all cases – Held that – The court found that the respondent should have addressed the adjournment request before passing the order – Writ petition was allowed – The respondents were directed to re-adjudicate the matter, provide a last opportunity for a personal hearing, and then pass a fresh speaking order in accordance with the law.

Represented By:

Counsel for the Petitioner: Vedant Agarwal with Mayank Taparia through VC

M/s PINKY MARBLES v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE & ORS – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

M/s PINKY MARBLES v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX INTELLIGENCE & ORS – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

🔒 Premium Content

Quick Link

Get In Touch