BTB Marketing Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Anti Evasion-I & Others
Delhi High Court | DECISION
ANAYLITICAL VIDEO:
INTRODUCTION
The petitioner, BTB Marketing Private Limited, challenged the action of the GST authorities in sealing all of its restaurant outlets under Section 67(2) of the Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
The dispute originated when the GST Department conducted an inspection through the Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion-I), during which the petitioner failed to produce its books of accounts. Consequently, a show cause notice was issued in February 2026, requiring the petitioner to furnish the relevant records. Although certain documents were subsequently submitted in May 2026, the authorities remained dissatisfied with the response.
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.
🔒 Premium Content
Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.
Become Premium Member