Skip to main content

Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » AMIT KUMAR BASAU & ANR. v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 13 (SPECIAL ZONE) ZONE 12 DELHI & ORS.

AMIT KUMAR BASAU & ANR. v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 13 (SPECIAL ZONE) ZONE 12 DELHI & ORS.

High Court, Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh, Justice & Shail Jain, Justice

AMIT KUMAR BASAU & ANR.
v.
SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 13 (SPECIAL ZONE) ZONE 12 DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C) 15327/2025 & CM APPL. 62787/2025 dated 08.10.2025

Law : GST
Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017
Notification/Circular : Notification No. 40/2021- Central Tax dated 29.12.2021, Notification No. 40/2021- State Tax dated 09.06.2022
Decision : In favour of assessee

Maintainability of writ petition – Demand – Interest & penalty – No reply filed to SCN due to CA oversight – Ex-parte order without hearing – Respondent objected maintainability as partnership firm unregistered – Section 69(2) of Partnership Act 1932 bars unregistered firm from filing suit to enforce contractual rights – Court held Section 69(2) not bar when statutory or common law rights being enforced – Petitioner holds GST registration despite being unregistered partnership firm – Held: Writ petition disposed – Writ maintainable – Petitioner to file appeal by 30.11.2025 with requisite pre-deposit – Appeal shall not be dismissed on limitation grounds if filed within time.

Represented By:

Counsel for the Petitioner: Abhishek Garg & Naman Mehta, Advs

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member