Union of India v. Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd.

 Supreme Court of India High Court | Decision Analytical Video : Introduction The dispute arose from the levy of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) on ocean freight in respect of imports made under Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF) contracts. Under a CIF contract: the foreign exporter arranges transportation and insurance; the importer pays a […]

M/s M Y Ent Bhatta v. State of U.P. & Another

Detailed Analysis of M/s M Y Ent Bhatta v. State of U.P. & Another 1.INTRODUCTION The petitioner, M/s M Y Ent Bhatta, challenged the cancellation of its GST registration vide order dated 05.01.2024. The GST department had initiated cancellation proceedings on the ground that the petitioner had allegedly failed to furnish GST returns for a […]

M/s Rama Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another

Allahabad High Court decision in M/s Rama Enterprises v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another ANAYLITICAL VIDEO : Introduction The petitioner, M/s Rama Enterprises, challenged: The Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 11.02.2025 issued for cancellation of GST registration. The ex parte cancellation order dated 26.03.2025 passed pursuant to the said notice. The petitioner contended that […]

M/s. Metal Syndicate v. Union of India

Gauhati High Court | Decision in M/s. Metal Syndicate Case Analytical Video : Click here to get the Analysis of the Judgement Introduction The Gauhati High Court delivered a significant taxpayer-friendly ruling concerning denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) under the GST regime. The dispute revolved around whether a bona fide purchasing dealer could be […]

NKR Traders v. State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) – 21.05.2026

Madras High Court | decision Analytical Video : https://youtu.be/LCrW7zs6quY Introduction In a significant judgment providing relief to taxpayers, the Madras High Court in NKR Traders v. State Tax Officer (21.05.2026) reaffirmed an important principle of GST jurisprudence that where the GST enactments prescribe a specific consequence for a default, the authorities cannot invoke the residuary […]