Skip to main content

M/s MAA JAGDAMBE ENGINEERING WORKS v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ORS.

High Court, Delhi Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, Justice & Ajay Digpaul, Justice M/s MAA JAGDAMBE ENGINEERING WORKS v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES & ORS. W.P.(C) 3635/2026 & CM APPL. 17745/2026 dated 02.04.2026 Law : GST Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 Relevant Section : Section 6, 73 & 74 Decision : In favour of assessee […]

M/s GUJRAL SONS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

High Court, Delhi Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, Justice & Ajay Digpaul, Justice M/s GUJRAL SONS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. W.P.(C) 4374/2026 dated 24.04.2026 Law : GST Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 Relevant Section : Section 83 Decision : In favour of assessee Provisional attachment – Second attachment order issued after expiry of initial […]

FATEH EDUCATION CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER & ORS.

High Court, Delhi Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, Justice & Ajay Digpaul, Justice FATEH EDUCATION CONSULTING PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER & ORS. W.P.(C) 17500/2025 dated 08.05.2026 Law : GST Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 & Integrated Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 Relevant Section : Section 54 & Section 5 Decision : In favour of […]

M/s SATNAM MOTOCORP PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

High Court, Rajasthan Inderjeet Singh, Justice & Ashok Kumar Jain, Justice M/s SATNAM MOTOCORP PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. D.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 14597/2023 dated 27.04.2026 Law : GST Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 Relevant Section : Section 107 Decision : In favour of revenue Maintainability of petition – Denial […]

TATA PLAY LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

High Court, Delhi Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, Justice & Ajay Digpaul, Justice TATA PLAY LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. W.P.(C) 5725/2026 & CM APPL. 28148/2026 & CM APPL. 28149/2026 dated 28.04.2026 Law : GST Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 Decision : Interim Entertainment tax recovery – GSTAT order post-remand challenged for exceeding […]