FRAMES BAY PRIVATE LIMITED v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE DELHI EAST

📅 June 8, 2026 👤 Team Batuk Consultancy 📂 GST, GST Case Laws

High Court, Delhi

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, Justice & Sanjeev Narula, Justice

FRAMES BAY PRIVATE LIMITED

CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE DELHI EAST

W.P.(C) 2496/2021 dated 23.02.2021

Law : GST

Decision : Interim

GSTIN Suspension and Impleadment of State Authority – The Petitioner erroneously included the Central Authority instead of the State Authority in their application. – The petitioner argues that the Central Authority is necessary for granting the reliefs sought. – The respondent pointed out the error in impleading the Central Authority. The petitioner agreed to include the State Authority but maintained that the Central Authority is essential for the reliefs. – The court ordered that the petitioner’s GSTIN suspension be stayed, – and transactions permitted until the next hearing. – The petitioner was required to provide documentation to the Respondent’s counsel – and a counter affidavit was to be submitted before the next hearing.

Represented by:

Counsel for the Petitioner: Abhishek Prasad & Anand Varma, Advs.

FRAMES BAY PRIVATE LIMITED v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE DELHI EAST

FRAMES BAY PRIVATE LIMITED v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE DELHI EAST

🔒 Premium Content

Quick Link

Get In Touch