Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » M/s MALABAR TRADE LINKS v. SUPERINTENDENT

M/s MALABAR TRADE LINKS v. SUPERINTENDENT

Introduction

This judgment of the Kerala High Court reiterates the settled legal principle that a composite Show Cause Notice (SCN) and a composite Order-in-Original covering multiple assessment years are not legally sustainable under the GST law. The Court reaffirmed that each financial year constitutes a separate assessment period requiring an independent Show Cause Notice and separate adjudication.

Relying upon the binding Division Bench decisions in Joint Commissioner (Intelligence & Enforcement) v. M/s. Lakshmi Mobiles Accessories and Tharayil Medicals (M/s.) v. Deputy Commissioner, Thrissur, the Court quashed both the composite Show Cause Notice and the consequential Order-in-Original. However, to balance the interests of the Revenue, the Court permitted fresh proceedings through separate notices for each assessment year and directed exclusion of the intervening period while computing limitation.

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member