Skip to main content

Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » PANKAJ MITTAL v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (CGST) , DELHI NORTH

PANKAJ MITTAL v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (CGST) , DELHI NORTH

High Court, Delhi
Yashwant Verma, Justice & Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, Justice

PANKAJ MITTAL
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (CGST) , DELHI NORTH

W. P. (C) 1426/2025 dated 04.02.2025

Law : GST
Act Name : Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017
Decision : Disposed off

Voluntary cancellation of registration – Cancellation application rejected on ground of non clarification/deposit of pending tax liability alongwith interest – ITC utilized on strength of invoices issued by cancelled suppliers and tax associated with such supplies have neither been paid in cash or through ITC – Availed excess ITC amount – – HELD: Writ petition disposed – Petitioner to furnish a response for consideration of competent authority within three weeks – Cancellation application be taken up for consideration thereafter.

Represented by:

Counsel for the Petitioner: Udit Bakshi, Bhwesh Bhola & Urvashi Dhiman, Advocates

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member