Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » SHAJI GEORGE AND PETER SANTHOSH RODRIGUES v. STATE TAX OFFICER (ENFORCEMENT), AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE), KOZHIKOD

SHAJI GEORGE AND PETER SANTHOSH RODRIGUES v. STATE TAX OFFICER (ENFORCEMENT), AND DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (INTELLIGENCE), KOZHIKOD

KERALA HIGH COURT | DECISION


Analytical Video :

Introduction

This judgment reiterates that once goods and conveyance are confiscated under Section 130 of the CGST Act, the High Court will ordinarily not grant provisional release in a writ petition, particularly where the confiscation order itself is not under challenge and disputed questions of fact exist. The Kerala High Court held that the CGST Act provides adequate statutory remedies under Section 130(7) for release of confiscated goods and under Section 107 for filing an appeal against the confiscation order. Accordingly, the petitioners were relegated to the statutory remedies.


Background of the Case

The petitioners sought provisional release of two tanker lorries transporting 20,000 litres of white kerosene.

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member