Skip to main content

Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » STANLEE (INDIA) ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI NORTH

STANLEE (INDIA) ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI NORTH

High Court, Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh, Justice & Renu Bhatnagar, Justice

STANLEE (INDIA) ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.
v.
THE COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI NORTH

W.P.(C) 5370/2025 dated 03.12.2025

Law : GST
Act Name : Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017
Relevant Section : Section 6, 73 & 74
Rule Number : Rule 92
Rule Name : Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017
Decision : In favour of assessee

Refund – IGST on exports – Excess ITC objection – Refund claims for subsequent export months rejected via RFD 08 citing excess ITC detected on GSTR 2A vs 3B reconciliation for FY 2019 20 – No SCN issued – Audit completed for FY 2018 24 raising no demand for 2019 20 – Court held excess ITC must be pursued only through proper proceedings under Sections 73/74 – RFD 08 under Rule 92(3) cannot be used as recovery mechanism or to withhold otherwise admissible export refunds – Supreme Court in Armour Security (India) Ltd. clarifies demand proceedings commence only with SCN – Held: Writ petition disposed – Order set aside – Department to grant full refund with statutory interest within two months.

Represented By:

Counsel for the Petitioner: Virag Tiwari & Himank Ahuja, Advs.

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member