Skip to main content

Home » Laws » GST Case Laws » WATER TECH ENGINEERS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CGST & ORS.

WATER TECH ENGINEERS v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CGST & ORS.


Analytical Video :

Introduction

The petitioner challenged the validity of the adjudication proceedings under the GST law on the ground that the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07, which communicated the tax demand, did not bear either the physical signature or the digital signature of the Proper Officer.

According to the petitioner, the CGST Rules and the prescribed statutory forms mandate that orders and notices issued by the Proper Officer must be duly authenticated by signature. Since the impugned DRC-07 was unsigned, it lacked legal sanctity and was liable to be quashed.

Continue Reading...
This is only a preview of the article. The complete article contains detailed analysis, examples, notifications, circulars, case laws, interpretations and practical guidance available to premium members.

🔒 Premium Content

Subscribe to access complete articles, notifications, circulars, case laws, downloads, videos and premium resources.

Become Premium Member